[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RE:Markup query
From: |
Davide Liessi |
Subject: |
Re: RE:Markup query |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Sep 2012 12:44:26 +0200 |
Hi Peter.
2012/9/7 Peter Gentry <address@hidden>:
>>> As a small example setting various swiches true/false in the
>>paper block often seems to have no effect - I guess the reason is that
>>> those switches are irrelevant in the context.
>>
>>This should never be the case. Please give examples.
>>
> This is the top level paper block I often use
>
> \paper {
[...]
> print-page-number = ##t
> print-first-page-number = ##f
[...]
> oddFooterMarkup = \markup {
> \fill-line {
> \on-the-fly
> #print-page-number-check-first
> \null \fontsize #2 \fromproperty
> #'header:mycustomtext
> \fontsize #2 \fromproperty
> #'page:page-number-string
> } % end of fill line
> } % end of markup block
> evenFooterMarkup = \oddFooterMarkup
> } % end of paper block
>
> 1. the first page footer always has the page number - I didn't want it.
> 2. changing the values for print-page-number and or print-first-page-number
> "appear" to have no effect
Regarding the page number problem, you should place "\on-the-fly
#print-page-number-check-first" immediately before "\fromproperty
#'page:page-number-string".
\on-the-fly checks if a condition is true and in that case it prints
the markup that immediately follows: you were applying \on-the-fly
check to \null.
See Notation Reference, section 3.2.2 "Custom headers footers and
titles", subsection "Custom layout for headers and footers" for a more
precise definition of \on-the-fly behaviour and for a list of other
conditions that can be checked.
Best wishes,
Davide
- RE: Markup Query, (continued)
- Markup query, Peter Gentry, 2012/09/06
- RE:Markup query, Peter Gentry, 2012/09/06
- Re: Markup query, Graham Percival, 2012/09/06
- Re: Markup query, Nick Payne, 2012/09/06
- Re: RE:Markup query, Phil Holmes, 2012/09/07
- Re: RE:Markup query, Phil Holmes, 2012/09/07
- Re: Markup query, David Kastrup, 2012/09/07
- Re: Markup query, David Kastrup, 2012/09/07