[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reviews of LilyPond...
From: |
Nils Gey |
Subject: |
Re: Reviews of LilyPond... |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Sep 2012 23:51:00 +0200 |
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 14:25:14 -0700
Nathan <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Brett McCoy <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:42 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>
> >> Well, I found LilyPond rated on a download site
> >> <URL:http://download.cnet.com/LilyPond/3000-2141_4-73566.html#rateit>.
> >> The download info appears more or less accurate, the reviews appear to
> >> be from 2.12. But I doubt that they would have changed significantly
> >> with 2.16...
> >
> > "The interface is extremely primitive. The programmer probably just
> > doesn't know Windows programming. "
> >
> > That made me laugh somewhat out loud.
>
> This bit made me chuckle:
>
> "There was also an open CMD window. Maybe I'm just being paranoid, but
> it struck me as suspicious. Why would a true Windows program have a
> CMD window and need user interaction to start?"
>
They have discovered the true nature of Lilypond. An elaborate virus.
But since the Lilypond devs never learned proper windows programming the virus
failed so far.