[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Subject: Re: lilypond manual intro
From: |
Trevor Daniels |
Subject: |
Re: Subject: Re: lilypond manual intro |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:11:28 +0100 |
Peter Gentry wrote Monday, September 10, 2012 9:28 AM
> Having had my share of gripes re the manuals I am now a "born again"
> supporter - they are great (not perfect) but great.
Nice to be appreciated - thanks!
> The notation manual is particularly good - the learning manual is fine never
> seen a problem
> with writing exclusively in absolute.
That's fine - absolute is there for those who prefer it.
> Like most normal people I find relative hard to get my head round and always
> end
> up with the wrong octave somewhere or other usually ending up beyond the
> range
> of the human ear.
Well, I don't think the rest of us are abnormal. A few minutes practice for
most
normal people is all it takes ;)
> If you import music from other programs absolute is the way to go - why is
> relative
> favoured so much?
For many tunes notes tend to lie quite close to the next one, so relative
is quicker to type. Also, as you've noted above, a single mistake is very
easy to spot. An octave mistake on a single note in polyphonic music in
absolute notation could easily go unnoticed.
Trevor