[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lilypond cheat sheat
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
Subject: |
Re: Lilypond cheat sheat |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:02:30 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) |
David Kastrup writes:
> We arrive at our indentation using Emacs, but even if we deliver the
> scripts for doing so, this does not mean we need to redistribute Emacs
> as well.
There is a difference between build time and run time dependencies.
Even if libreoffice, like Emacs would obviously not become a run time
dependency, having it as a build time dependency could be awkward?
Or would you want to store cached binary output alongside its source in
git? I'm not a big fan of that.
Jan
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl
- Re: Lilypond cheat sheet, (continued)
- Re: Lilypond cheat sheat, Janek Warchoł, 2012/11/06
- Re: Lilypond cheat sheat, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2012/11/06
- Re: Lilypond cheat sheat, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/11/07
- Re: Lilypond cheat sheat, Janek Warchoł, 2012/11/07
- Re: Lilypond cheat sheat, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2012/11/07
- Re: Lilypond cheat sheat, Francisco Vila, 2012/11/07
- Re: Lilypond cheat sheat, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2012/11/07
- Re: Lilypond cheat sheat, Noeck, 2012/11/07
- Re: Lilypond cheat sheat, David Kastrup, 2012/11/07
- Re: Lilypond cheat sheat,
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <=
- Re: Lilypond cheat sheat, Marc Hohl, 2012/11/07
- Re: Lilypond cheat sheat, Phil Holmes, 2012/11/07
Re: Lilypond cheat sheat, Guy Stalnaker, 2012/11/07
Re: Lilypond cheat sheat, Noeck, 2012/11/11