[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator
From: |
Hans Åberg |
Subject: |
Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Nov 2016 20:10:39 +0100 |
> On 28 Oct 2016, at 21:48, David Wright <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Fri 28 Oct 2016 at 11:22:00 (-0700), Tobin Chodos wrote:
>> Forgive me if this is a too-easy issue for the list, but: is there a way to
>> define a time compound time signature such as 4/4 + 1/3? That is, the
>> measure is four quarter notes long plus one triplet eighth note.
>
> Isn't this just 13/8? Three triplet eighth notes make a quarter note.
> So it's 3+3+3+3+1 all over 8, and the notes will be written out as
> four dotted quarter notes and an eighth note per measure.
Indeed, 12/8 may be complicated notationally if the beats of length 3/8 are
divided into twos and fours, so 4/4 might be preferred.
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, (continued)
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, tisimst, 2016/11/02
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Chris Yate, 2016/11/02
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Urs Liska, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Urs Liska, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, mclaren, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/02
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, mclaren, 2016/11/03
Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator,
Hans Åberg <=
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/02
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/02
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/02
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, mclaren, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Martin Neubauer, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, mclaren, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/03