[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Aesthetics question -- how would you typeset this?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Aesthetics question -- how would you typeset this? |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Jul 2019 20:38:39 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Evan Driscoll <address@hidden> writes:
> The difference between << {...} // {...} >> and chords I get -- but what
> about << {...} {...} >> *without* the //, for example in the first three
> lines of my snippet? Those seem to work the same as collating the
> corresponding notes in chords.
They are pretty much equivalent except when using articulations on
non-chord notes that have an event listener (like the Fingering_engraver
for fingerings). Those are sent to the event listener when using
simultaneous music but are engraved using the New_fingering_engraver
when they are written in-chord. If there is no event listener (like
usually for string numbers), they are left to deal with for the
New_fingering_engraver either way and there is no difference.
So there is a difference between the look of
<< c4-1 e-3 >>
and
<c-1 e-3>4
but not between
<< c4\1 e\3 >>
and
<c\1 e\3>4
Unless, of course, you add/remove engravers.
--
David Kastrup
RE: Aesthetics question -- how would you typeset this?, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2019/07/03