lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: caesura or other ornamentation ?.


From: Andrew Bernard
Subject: Re: caesura or other ornamentation ?.
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 23:30:19 +1000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0

Hi All,

With the understanding that this is long before the age of standardisation of anything, and one author's table of ornaments is not necessarily what another composer would have, and performers would naturally have taken great liberties with interpretation of signs. Not until 19c did people become very rigid about ornaments and signs. I write speaking as a harpsichord player myself.

As an aside, but related, to this day nobody really has any clear idea what the single and double strokes on stems that are ornament signs in English Virginal Music really mean. There are dozens of different opinions.

As for whether trills and shakes start on the principal note or not, that is an Eternal Debate that will never be resolved.

Isn't there an article here about making new ornaments for noteheads, for 18c French music in particular?

https://lilypondblog.org/2013/08/adding-ornamentations-to-note-heads-part-1/


Andrew


On 10/07/2019 1:21 am, Torsten Hämmerle wrote:
prelleur_treatise_ornaments_1731.png
<http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/t3887/prelleur_treatise_ornaments_1731.png>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]