[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [SPAM] Re: Re Problems with cues
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: [SPAM] Re: Re Problems with cues |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Dec 2019 12:54:20 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Please do not take discussions off the list without bothering to
announce it.
Resent, this time with list included.
Peter <address@hidden> writes:
> Yes I did manually change using the Fresco snippet but only after the
> problem in order to put all the files on the current version number. I
> appreciate that you cannot trawl through all my files
You haven't posted "all your files" or anything actually allowing your
claims to be tested. There are a number of \include files required to
make them compile.
> and that you have better things to do.
I resent your implication that I refuse being helpful when you give us
nothing to work on.
> A regular oddity is the message no glyph for U+92 in the .off file ?
> significant?
It means that in the given font there is no backslash. Text font layout
of TeX fonts tends to be a bit weird but nevertheless this seems
strange.
> Many thanks for bearing with an old ponder.
--
David Kastrup