[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi
From: |
J Martin Rushton |
Subject: |
Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi |
Date: |
Fri, 02 Sep 2022 22:46:01 +0100 |
On Fri, 2022-09-02 at 16:17 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 02 Sep 2022 at 21:43:25 (+0100), J Martin Rushton wrote:
> > I've just spent another couple of hours clearing out previous
> > attempts
> > to get Frescobaldi running and attempting to sort out its
> > dependency
> > hell.
> >
> > Is there any alternative to Frescobaldi?
>
> An editor (emacs) + LilyPond + PDF viewer (xpdf).
> (My choices in parentheses.)
>
> > I'm running AlmaLinux 8.6 if that helps.
>
> Not a great deal; does it mean that F~ isn't part of the
> distribution?
>
> Cheers,
> David.
My preference is for vi, but yes, that's what I've been using for the
last couple of years since F~ stopped working. What I miss though is
the back link from the score to the source, and the MIDI playback.
--
J Martin Rushton MBCS
Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi, Andrew Bernard, 2022/09/02
Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi, Davide Liessi, 2022/09/03