Re: docs about Rest vertical position

[Kieren MacMillan]

Hi Martín,

> how do you think that this feature is more useful than \tweaking the y-offset?

I don't, personally.  =)

> If the documentation explains how to move a rest, the officially recommended 
> way should be using \tweak in my opinion.

I agree. I was simply offering a less… um… nuclear doc-revision option.

> It's unclear to me what's the use case of the option of adding a note to a 
> \rest (which in itself sounds like a contradiction).

Much like a few other “seems like a great idea when you're a newbie” (which I 
will refrain from explicitly mentioning here), I believe the main use case is 
to make it really easy for new users to fix collisions or “hard-code” the rest 
position, without introducing them to \override-ing and \tweak-ing. 

> If we follow the WSIWYM paradigm, you can't possibly mean to put a 
> "note-rest" somewhere. Perhaps not pointing that out or removing the feature 
> altogether is better in the long run?

I agree.

Cheers,
Kieren