[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi
From: |
Davide Liessi |
Subject: |
Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi |
Date: |
Sat, 3 Sep 2022 10:07:20 +0200 |
Dear all,
I answered elsewhere
(https://github.com/frescobaldi/frescobaldi/issues/1454,
https://groups.google.com/g/frescobaldi/c/dUQPO85jUL0), but for the
sake of completeness:
Il giorno sab 3 set 2022 alle ore 03:24 Andrew Bernard
<andrew.bernard@mailbox.org> ha scritto:
> Part of the process to install PyQt4
> is to install enough of Qt4 to get qmake and that's a nightmare. It's
> absurdly complicated. And Qt4 has been obsoleted anyway, making this all
> that much harder.
Frescobaldi moved to Qt5 with version 3.0.0 (released 17 February 2017).
It currently does not support Qt6.
Best wishes.
Davide
- Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi, (continued)
Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi, Andrew Bernard, 2022/09/02
Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi,
Davide Liessi <=
Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/09/03
Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi, Andrew Bernard, 2022/09/03
- Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi, J Martin Rushton, 2022/09/03
- Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi, Guy Stalnaker, 2022/09/03
- Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi, J Martin Rushton, 2022/09/03
- Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi, Silvain Dupertuis, 2022/09/04
- Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi, Thomas Morley, 2022/09/04
- Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi, Adam M. Griggs, 2022/09/04
Re: Alternative to Frescobaldi, Andrew Bernard, 2022/09/04