linphone-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Linphone-users] Linphone-wx on Windows Vista and IPv6


From: Simon Morlat
Subject: Re: [Linphone-users] Linphone-wx on Windows Vista and IPv6
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 22:01:40 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.9.7

Hi,

Thanks for your test report.
Actually linphone-win32-0.2.2 simply didn't work in IPv6. Did you try with 
linphone-win32-0.4.1 ? A friend of mine reported me that it was working, 
however I have no details on how the nameserver was operating.

Simon

Le Friday 07 September 2007 20:11:14 Joonbum Byun, vous avez écrit :
> Hi, there:
>
> What I'm trying to build is a SIP based VoIP network on pure IPv6 network.
> With three Linux based routers and a DNS server serving only AAAA query, I
> built a test bed network with IPv6 protocol only. To test a SIP based VoIP
> network, I installed SER SIP proxy server in a LInux machine (say, host
> A),, a Linphone Linux version on a Linux machine(say, host B) and Linphone
> Windows version (linphone-win32-0.2.2-setup.exe) on a Windows Vista (say,
> host C).
>
> I know the Linphone Windows vesion is for XP only, not for Vista, but I
> took a liberty to install it on Vista because Vista is known to support
> IPv6 much better than XP and check what is happening. Installation was
> completed without any problem and GUI came up when executed. I enabled
> IPv6 protocol by setting Tools==> Setting==> IP Version to Use as IPv6. I
> put host B's host name in Call window  and pressed Stat! button. When
> looked into the message exchange through Ethereal, Linphone sent out query
> to DNS server asking for A record address of host B instead of AAAA. As
> DNS server keeps only AAAA record of host B, it replied with null address.
>
> I'm aware that Linphone-wx is in very early stage of development and you
> may already realize this issue, but just wanted to report this.
>
> P.S.
> If you want me to test your snapshot version of Linphone-wx here, I'll be
> glad to do so.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joon






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]