Re: [Linphone-users] Linphone Ubuntu PPA

[Felix Lechner]

Last I looked iLBC was licensed under the attached document. The registration requirement for commercial users (which may include making a work-related phone call) imposed an restriction I found unacceptable.

The license may have changed when the codec became part of WebRTC.

I looked through your iLBC source package. Did you get the code from the WebRTC project?

On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Ilya Melinikov <address@hidden> wrote:

On Saturday 17 May 2014 05:54:26 Felix Lechner wrote:

> The exceptions are

> packages related to iLBC, which I am not sure should be distributed under

> its current license

 

So what license is for iLBC?

 

Original site (http://www.ilbcfreeware.org/) says that iLBC is now part of WebRTC. On WebRTC site (www.webrtc.org) I found this:

http://www.webrtc.org/license-rights/license

 

Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ILBC) says this:

"open source royalty-free"

"License: 3-clause BSD"

 

 

> As it stands, 'belle-sip' failed to build from source. It looks to me like

> there is a problem with the symbols

> file<https://launchpadlibrarian.net/175782105/buildlog_ubuntu-quantal-amd64.

> belle-sip_1.3.0-1ubuntu0~ppa1~quantal_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz>, but I am not

> sure.

 

I don't understand how it could happen. May be package polarssl was not in PPA on belle-sip build moment? Build log:

Get:74 http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu/ quantal/universe libpolarssl0 amd64 1.1.4-1 [133 kB]

 

Must be version 1.3.4

 

> You can try my packaging for 1.3.0 from the Debian VOIP Team and see

> if that works any better.

> How did you get 'belle-sip' to build in your PPA?

 

So it is. belle-sip and polarssl I backported from Jessy. With minimal changes.

 

 

--

Ilya Melinikov

 

_______________________________________________
Linphone-users mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-users

gips_iLBClicense.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document