--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
RE: Hiding whole measure rests from conductor score |
Date: |
Sun, 08 Jul 2007 14:11:00 -0700 |
If you mean this is the answer:
"When skipBars is set, the result will look OK, but the bar numbering will be
off."
I already found that out from reading the manual, but I am trying to figure
out a work-around. Also, what about the notion of the part sheets showing mm
rests while the conductor score just shows empty measures?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mats Bengtsson [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2007 1:57 PM
> To: Dewdman42
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: Hiding whole measure rests from conductor score
>
> If you read the section on "Rests" in the users manual, it
> tells you to
> look in the section called "Multimeasure rests"
> for whole measure rests, which should answer your question.
>
> /Mats
>
> Quoting Dewdman42 <address@hidden>:
>
> >
> > I have come up with my own way to hide whole measure rests
> from the conductor
> > score, while displaying them for the parts, but I would
> like to hear if
> > there is a generally accepted better way of handling this,
> as my way feels a
> > little complicated. I'm trying to have it so that I have
> only definition of
> > the actual note data and then the part and score are
> formatted differently
> > from the same note data.
> >
> > Basically I defined a couple "macros" such as
> >
> > wholeRest = {s1}
> >
> > Then when creating my voice data I use that macro:
> >
> > myVoice = \newVoice { relative c' {| \wholeRest | c d e
> f | \wholeRest
> > | }}
> >
> > When I produce the Part score for that player I would then
> change the
> > wholeRest definition to {r1}
> >
> > So that works pretty well, but I am wondering if there is
> an easier way to
> > begin with, and then also since I am going to want to have
> multi-measure
> > rests for the parts, that brings up another question, which
> is how I could
> > have one set of voice data that feeds both part and score,
> and the part
> > version has a multi-measure rest, while the score version
> just has empty
> > measures.
> >
> > Perhaps I need to use some kind of parallel, merged voices
> strategy that is
> > not too complicated?
> >
> > Please forgive me if these are naive questions. I am just
> starting out with
> > Lilypond and I have been pouring through the manual for the
> past couple days
> > trying to figure this stuff out myself, but a few things are not too
> > straightforward.
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> >
> http://www.nabble.com/Hiding-whole-measure-rests-from-conducto
> r-score-tf4045659.html#a11491939
> > Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lilypond-user mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
> >
>
>
>
>
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
confirm ed89553e53b5c80f177b012ea04a60c812d2af6e |
If you reply to this message, keeping the Subject: header intact,
Mailman will discard the held message. Do this if the message is
spam. If you reply to this message and include an Approved: header
with the list password in it, the message will be approved for posting
to the list. The Approved: header can also appear in the first line
of the body of the reply.
--- End Message ---