lmi-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lmi-commits] [lmi] valyuta/002 6b28993 06/65: clarify non-MEC solves


From: Greg Chicares
Subject: [lmi-commits] [lmi] valyuta/002 6b28993 06/65: clarify non-MEC solves
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 16:55:12 -0400 (EDT)

branch: valyuta/002
commit 6b28993bcae428e57c3205b45dc424d308dc0ca5
Author: Gregory W. Chicares <gchicares@sbcglobal.net>
Commit: Gregory W. Chicares <gchicares@sbcglobal.net>

    clarify non-MEC solves
---
 ihs_avsolve.cpp | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ihs_avsolve.cpp b/ihs_avsolve.cpp
index 2464be5..7631208 100644
--- a/ihs_avsolve.cpp
+++ b/ihs_avsolve.cpp
@@ -126,6 +126,9 @@ class SolveHelper
 /// contract ever becomes a MEC. The result is naturally a boundary
 /// value, so it is not interesting to compare it to any solve input.
 ///
+/// Non-MEC solves for loan or withdrawal are untested--see:
+///   https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/lmi/2009-02/msg00028.html
+///
 /// Non-MEC solves seem acceptably fast despite this two-valued step
 /// function. Other options considered include:
 ///  - Use MEC duration. This inserts a monotone segment into the
@@ -232,8 +235,7 @@ currency AccountValue::SolveTest(currency a_CandidateValue)
 
     if(mce_solve_for_non_mec == SolveTarget_)
         {
-//      return 0.5 - InvariantValues().IsMec;
-        return currency(InvariantValues().IsMec ? -1.0 : 1.0); // Backport 
first.
+        return currency(InvariantValues().IsMec ? -1.0 : 1.0);
         }
 
     return value - SolveTargetCsv_;



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]