[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Latin 2 support
From: |
Valeriy E. Ushakov |
Subject: |
Re: Latin 2 support |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Nov 2000 18:31:53 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.3i |
On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 13:54:21 +0100, dr.Eduard Werner (Edward Wornar) wrote:
> @SysInclude{ latin2 }
> @SysInclude{ slides }
>
> @OverheadTransparencies
> @InitialFont{ TimesCE Base 17p }
> However, this does not work w.o. the @InitialFont directive and I
> think it should.
This is hard to achieve without revamping packaging system (and that
probably gonna break existing setups, which is bad).
> The other problem is that the latin-2 support is incomplete, the
> latin-2 consonants with acute accents are missing almost completely,
> so that the package would work for Polish, Croatian or Sorbian.
>From looking at the "plus" files in 'fonts' my guess is that the extra
composites were submitted by a Czech user (let me check... rummage,
rummage, rummage, aha! - Jaroslav Serdula (big thanks!)).
You can extend the "plus" files by example. Don't forget to submit
your changes to Jeff.
> Furthermore, I often have mixed texts using latin-[2-5]; I'd like to
> be able to use the unicode stuff of mule and probably it would be no
> problem to make lout recognize two-char sequences for typesetting a
> certain character.
Unfortunately, Lout doesn't support Unicode yet. Also, since Lout
consumes its input in a way that is very different from TeX's, it's
harder to device a solution similar to TeX accents.
SY, Uwe
--
address@hidden | Zu Grunde kommen
http://www.ptc.spbu.ru/~uwe/ | Ist zu Grunde gehen
- Latin 2 support, dr.Eduard Werner (Edward Wornar), 2000/11/24
- Re: Latin 2 support,
Valeriy E. Ushakov <=