[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] The future of lwIP

[Chris Borrelli]

Adam,

I would be interested in CVS write access.  My main interest for lwIP is 
Gigabit Ethernet.  So, anything I can do to help that effort, I'd be 
willing.  I also have a port for the Xilinx Virtex-II Pro device, which 
has a PPC405 processor embedded in the fabric.

 -Chris

Adam Dunkels wrote:

>Hi all!
>
>After reading through some 160 mails and sending out nearly 30 myself,
>I'm feeling pretty red-eyed right now 8-)
>
>As you all have noticed the last few months, my lwIP-time has been way
>to small. I feel really bad about the fact that there are several
>patches and bugfixes that haven't been applied and that the 0.6 version
>should have been put out months ago.
>
>Therefore, I have decided to put up lwIP on the open source development
>portal sourceforge.net. This will make it possible for anyone to follow
>the development with anonymous read-only CVS. But most importantly: this
>will open up the CVS to other developers besides me.
>
>I have opened an lwIP account on sourceforge and will be uploading the
>homepage to http://lwip.sourceforge.net/ soon. This will be the new
>official URL for lwIP.
>
>I am currently reading through the documentation from sourceforge on how
>to install the CVS account there and will commit the current lwIP
>development version.
>
>This will also mean that the lwIP mailing list will be moved over to
>sourceforge. I'm not sure that it is possible to move everyone from this
>list to the new list automatically, but I'll see what can be done.
>
>So, who would be interested in becoming a collaborative developer with
>CVS write access? I am not sure about the way lwIP ought to be managed;
>I guess we'll see how many that are interested in joining in and work it
>out from there. What do you think?
>
>/adam
>  
>


[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]