[lwip-users] lwIP reference in Embedded Systems Design magazine (previously DHCP - getting address works but not responding)

[Pettinato, Jim]

Actually, the author used the word 'advanced' ('sophisticated' was my paraphrasing) - and my interpretation was that he was referring to throughput, primarily - specifically referencing zero-copy and checksum bypass features...

 

Hasn't that very topic come up recently with regard to lwIP??  ;-)

-----Original Message-----
From: Goldschmidt Simon [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 2:48 PM
To: Pettinato, Jim; address@hidden
Subject: AW: [lwip-users] DHCP - getting address works but not responding

Cool! I'd like to see an independent comparision of lwIP vs. a more "sophisticated" stack, though!
As I am not a native speaker, what exactly do you think they meant with 'sophisticated'? I think we also have some clever ideas in our stack ;-) OK, we might have to work a little to get it fast and real stable. And I'm biased, too (of course)...

-----Originalnachricht-----
Von: address@hidden
An: Mailing list for lwIP users
Gesendet: 14.05.2007 19:24
Betreff: RE: [lwip-users] DHCP - getting address works but not responding


All,

For those that might be interested, the cover feature of this month's
Embedded Systems Design magazine ("Put a Configurable 32-bit Processor
in Your FPGA", N. Sundaramoothy, E.S.D. May 2007) mentions lwIP as the
sole example of a stack for use with a 'lite' Ethernet subsystem in the
titular application.

Unfortunately, the author recommends a more sophisticated stack if a
higher throughput is required... personally I think lwIP could still fit
the bill, but hey, I might be biased. ;)

Congrats and thanks again to everyone who has contributed and supported
the lwIP project - it's good to see acknowlegement in an accepted
industry publication such as E.S.D.!

- Jim


_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users