[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: R: [lwip-users] ip_reass
From: |
Kieran Mansley |
Subject: |
Re: R: [lwip-users] ip_reass |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:29:37 +0100 |
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 16:17 +0200, address@hidden wrote:
> The protocol headers are packed, which hides/solves this problem.
Of course, that is what I was missing.
> I'll add a bug entry. The possible fix will be packing the helper
> struct, I guess, since it has to fit inside the IP header -
> MEM_ALIGNMENT can make it too big.
>
> Oh, Ed: thanks for finding this.
Thanks Simon.
Kieran
- [lwip-users] ip_reass, Ed Sutter, 2008/10/08
- Re: [lwip-users] ip_reass, Jonathan Larmour, 2008/10/09
- Re: [lwip-users] ip_reass, Ed Sutter, 2008/10/09
- R: [lwip-users] ip_reass, Ceresoli Luca, 2008/10/10
- Re: R: [lwip-users] ip_reass, Ed Sutter, 2008/10/10
- Re: R: [lwip-users] ip_reass, Kieran Mansley, 2008/10/10
- Re: R: [lwip-users] ip_reass, address@hidden, 2008/10/10
- Re: R: [lwip-users] ip_reass,
Kieran Mansley <=
- Re: R: [lwip-users] ip_reass, Ed Sutter, 2008/10/11
- Re: R: [lwip-users] ip_reass, Simon Goldschmidt, 2008/10/11
- Re: R: [lwip-users] ip_reass, Ed Sutter, 2008/10/11
- Re: [lwip-users] ip_reass, address@hidden, 2008/10/17
- R: R: [lwip-users] ip_reass, Ceresoli Luca, 2008/10/10
RE: [lwip-users] ip_reass, Taranowski, Thomas (SWCOE), 2008/10/09