[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] LWIP/WIN32 UDP performance (throughtput)
From: |
Stephane Lesage |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] LWIP/WIN32 UDP performance (throughtput) |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:35:22 +0100 |
> But then struct pbuf is still only 16 bytes long, so payload might
> start in the middle of a 32-byte border, which leads to faults when
> flushing cache (since the struct pbuf members are still used cached) or
> am I wrong there?
I don't have the problem, because:
1. I don't need to align my payload. I just need to ensure that a cache line
cannot contain payload of pbuf N and struct of pbuf N+1.
I do this by setting (PBUF_POOL_BUFSIZE + sizeof(struct pbuf)) = multiple of
cache line size
2. on RX, the pbuf is owned by the driver so I can safely flush the cache to
get the payload, because I know the stack will not modify a value in the struct.
> > But I agree it could be easier with something like:
> > #define PBUF_ALIGNMENT 32
>
> That's what I imagined (only with another name maybe).
Ok, maybe we need 2 settings:
1. alignement of pbuf struct
2. alignement of pbuf payload (may lead to wasted memory)
--
Stéphane Lesage
- Re: [lwip-users] LWIP/WIN32 UDP performance (throughtput), (continued)
Re: [lwip-users] LWIP/WIN32 UDP performance (throughtput), Zayaz Volk, 2012/02/08
Re: [lwip-users] LWIP/WIN32 UDP performance (throughtput), Simon Goldschmidt, 2012/02/16