|
From: | address@hidden |
Subject: | Re: [lwip-users] [Bulk] Re: the sequentiality of the lwip stack |
Date: | Tue, 18 Mar 2014 21:46:22 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 |
Gisle Vanem wrote:
Me too. A socket-handle should only be an index into some process-global table. So (comparing to other OS'es), there should be nothing preventing us using sockets across threads.
There's nothing preventing you from using a socket across threads. You only can't use it from more than one thread *at the same time*. This would be a special case which would have to be taken care of (and is not, yet, to keep the code small).
Simon
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |