[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx slang vs (n)curses
From: |
Klaus Weide |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx slang vs (n)curses |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Oct 1996 15:51:49 -0500 (CDT) |
On Thu, 24 Oct 1996, Rob Partington - Admin wrote:
> My code doesn't add color support for ncurses the same as the vanilla
> slang version does - it provides for color styles (IMO more powerful than
> the vanilla slang version). The vanilla slang color support is trickery -
> underline is mapped to color 1, bold to color 2, underline+bold to 3 etc.
>
> You can get the same effect by configuring your terminal program (much
> like Fote). It's a nice hack for people without configurable terminal
> emulators though (how *do* you do that on a Linux terminal?)
By creating a custom terminfo file, I would assume...
bold=<Linux console's escape to set color blue>
etc.
Klaus
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a mail message to address@hidden
; with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
; quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;
- LYNX-DEV Lynx slang vs (n)curses, Wayne Buttles, 1996/10/24
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx slang vs (n)curses, Foteos Macrides, 1996/10/24
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx slang vs (n)curses, Foteos Macrides, 1996/10/24
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx slang vs (n)curses, Foteos Macrides, 1996/10/24
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx slang vs (n)curses, Foteos Macrides, 1996/10/24
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx slang vs (n)curses, Scott McGee (Personal), 1996/10/24
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx slang vs (n)curses, Nelson Henry Eric, 1996/10/25