Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 3.0

[root]

Nelson Henry Eric wrote:
> 
> > OK folks, is there a goal for Lynx 3.0 or 2.8 or whatever we are going to
> > call it?  
> 
[...]
> > One major goal for me is to have at least a Win32 version integrated into
> > the mainstream code and hopefully a semi-functional DJGPP version as well. 
> 
> Not just you.  This is an admirable goal, and for lynx-dev to pass up this
> opportunity would be a tragedy.  How about it?  Is there any reason Wayne
> shouldn't put up his portable-to-Win32 lynx2.7+bugfixes (to answer your
> question of the other day), and call it 2.8?  If Klaus and Rob should be
> inclined they could offer replacement file sets to that 2.8.  Whereever
> they overlap, there's enough of us out here who could patch it together.

Lets all patch up our 2.7s with Wayne's stuff and call it 2.8 Alpha .01
perhaps.  Somhow, just adding one more machine and a couple of bugfixes
dosn't seem like enough for a new version.  I agree, we need to get Klaus &
Rob's stuff in.

 -- James Mastros
 
 (NB: Not commenting is generaly approval.)
 
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE:  Send a mail message to address@hidden
;                  with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
;                  quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;