[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
LYNX-DEV Userdefs.h and Lynx.cfg consolidation
From: |
Roger Hill |
Subject: |
LYNX-DEV Userdefs.h and Lynx.cfg consolidation |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Mar 1997 19:05:25 +0400 (GMT-4) |
One of the projects I have been contemplating is the consolidation of
userdefs.h and lynx.cfg. By this I mean that there are many options in
userdefs that "can be overridden in lynx.cfg". That being so, then to my
mind there is no point in setting them in userdefs.
So...I want to move all the overridable stuff to the end of userdefs, and
maybe concentrate the stuff that HAS to be set in userdefs to the top.
Three questions...
1. is this a sensible idea?
2. if so, is the order of options in userdefs significant?
3. if an option is multiply defined in userdefs (by accident, say), which
one takes precedence, the first or the last?
Any thoughts or comments welcome.
============================================================================
Roger Hill, P.O.Box 4T, Barbados, West Indies.
Tel:246-230-9596 Fax:246-433-8365 E-mail: address@hidden
============================================================================
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a mail message to address@hidden
; with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
; quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;
- LYNX-DEV Userdefs.h and Lynx.cfg consolidation,
Roger Hill <=
- Re: LYNX-DEV Userdefs.h and Lynx.cfg consolidation, Jim Spath (Webmaster Jim), 1997/03/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV Userdefs.h and Lynx.cfg consolidation, Larry W. Virden, x2487, 1997/03/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV Userdefs.h and Lynx.cfg consolidation, Hiram Lester, Jr., 1997/03/05
- LYNX-DEV Re: Userdefs.h and Lynx.cfg consolidation, Roger Hill, 1997/03/06
- Re: LYNX-DEV Userdefs.h and Lynx.cfg consolidation, Philip Webb, 1997/03/09