[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV [Fwd: BoS: A vulnerability in Lynx (all versions)]
From: |
Benjamin C. W. Sittler |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV [Fwd: BoS: A vulnerability in Lynx (all versions)] |
Date: |
Wed, 7 May 1997 13:48:53 -0600 (MDT) |
On Wed, 7 May 1997, Larry W. Virden, x2487 wrote:
> >Other than that, it looks okay, except that using the numeric signal codes
> >is more portable than using the mnemonics.
>
> Did you perhaps mean to say:
> >Other than that, it looks okay, except that using the mnemonis signal codes
> >is more portable than using the numerics?
>
> Because I've seen reports on comp.lang.unix and elsewhere regarding the fact
> that signal _numbers_ change from OS to OS, and sometimes from release to
> release
> within an OS, but that the mnemonics, at least as defined in the SVID or
> POSIX, won't change.
This is true, but older sh versions don't understand the mnemonics.
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a mail message to address@hidden
; with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
; quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;
Re: LYNX-DEV [Fwd: BoS: A vulnerability in Lynx (all versions)], Benjamin C. W. Sittler, 1997/05/07
Re: LYNX-DEV [Fwd: BoS: A vulnerability in Lynx (all versions)], Alan Cox, 1997/05/07
RE: LYNX-DEV [Fwd: BoS: A vulnerability in Lynx (all versions)], Brian Tillman, x8425, 1997/05/07
Re: LYNX-DEV [Fwd: BoS: A vulnerability in Lynx (all versions)], Scott McGee (Personal), 1997/05/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV [Fwd: BoS: A vulnerability in Lynx (all versions)], Larry W. Virden, x2487, 1997/05/07
- LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx..., Klaus Weide, 1997/05/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx..., Alan Cox, 1997/05/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx..., Jim Spath (Webmaster Jim), 1997/05/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx..., Alan Cox, 1997/05/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx..., Jim Spath (Webmaster Jim), 1997/05/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx..., Jonathan Sergent, 1997/05/08