[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
LYNX-DEV Semantics of DOSPATH
From: |
Jason F. McBrayer |
Subject: |
LYNX-DEV Semantics of DOSPATH |
Date: |
13 Jul 1997 07:59:49 -0600 |
Hi. I've been fooling with the development code trying to incorporate
my OS/2 patches, and I have a question regarding the DOSPATH define.
What does it mean? The README.386-win says that it's for "All
DOS-like systems", but how much DOSishness is implied by this? My
OS/2 patches for Lynx 2-7-1 treat OS/2 as a weird UNIX (since I'm
using EMX gcc to compile) that has DOS-like pathnames. I haven't
really looked at much code that's not close to the sources of my
compiler error messages (blush), but it seems that DOSPATH implies
more DOSishness than simply DOS-like pathnames. Should I try to use
DOSPATH for an OS/2 version of the development code Lynx? Or should I
add my own fixes for each place a local file is accessed (as I've done
for Lynx 2-7-1)?
--
--------------------------------------------------------+
Jason F. McBrayer address@hidden |
Cosmic indifference sure is a drag. -- Akbar (or Jeff) |
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a mail message to address@hidden
; with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
; quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;
- LYNX-DEV Semantics of DOSPATH,
Jason F. McBrayer <=