[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
LYNX-DEV: webwatch?; was "troublesome URL at Readers Digest"
From: |
Jay W. Meeuwig |
Subject: |
LYNX-DEV: webwatch?; was "troublesome URL at Readers Digest" |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Jul 1997 09:46:55 -0300 (ADT) |
Hi, can U tell me what "webwatch-l" is?
Is it "looking out for L{ynx}" ? If so, i'd like to be involved...
I'm working on some Canuck gov. buro_masters... to get them to make sure
their sites are "readable; reasonable; reliable, as well as digestable"
for ordinary "lynx_stiffs" !!!
Feel free to use the
"readable; reasonable; and reliable..."
on Reader's Digest.
On Tue, 15 Jul 1997, Al Gilman wrote:
> to follow up on what Rick Roderick said:
> > I am using Lynx 7.0.1. I am having trouble with
> > http://www.readersdigest.com.
> > I would appreciate any help or sugestions you might give.
> Rick, after you asked on webwatch-l, we figured out what is wrong
> with that site. The are using a redirection message with a
> relative URL where there should be an absolute URL. After I
> asked on lynx-dev Klaus Weide explained if for us.
>
> We are ready for someone to write to the Readers Digest and ask
> them to fix it. Do you want to be the one? Why don't we stick
> to webwatch-l for this one?
> --
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a mail message to address@hidden
; with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
; quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;