[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV ftp files `d'ownloaded by Lynx usually larger than when usi
From: |
David Combs |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV ftp files `d'ownloaded by Lynx usually larger than when using unix ftp |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Dec 1997 14:02:55 -0800 (PST) |
I have had such problems too, was maybe
first to post my experience of "d" vs "newline" (on
a link, both of them) vs running ftp straight, with
explicit "binary" set) -- but larry virden responded
that he tried the same thing, but with NO problem.
The version I use on netcom keeps getting updated,
so was likely a different (newer) version than larry's.
Yes, look at the size.
Also maybe do a trial gunzip or gzcat to /dev/null,
to see if you get an error message.
If unable to do thru lynx, then just run
straight (unix) "ftp" command, setting
"binary" explicitly.
> From address@hidden Sun Dec 7 22:38:03 1997
> Date: Sun, 07 Dec 1997 21:51:07 -0800
> From: James Elkinton <address@hidden>
> Organization: Nairinthus
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01C-PBWG (Win95; U)
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: LYNX-DEV ftp files `d'ownloaded by Lynx usually larger than when
> using unix ftp
> References: <address@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Sender: address@hidden
> Precedence: bulk
> Reply-To: address@hidden
>
> Nelson Henry Eric wrote:
> >
> > I just downloaded a set of gzipped files, once by pressing `d' on the
> > highlighted link from within Lynx and then "saving to disk", and then
> > again by `get'ing in binary mode using the standard ftp on SunOS4.1.3.
> >
> > Seems to me they should be exactly the same size, but
>
> [Results showing different file sizes chopped]
>
> > BTW, the Lynx-downloaded files fail to patch on, whereas the ftp files go
> > on,
> > which explains the problems I had getting ncurses-4.1 patched last week.
>
> I have been getting intermittent file corruptions as well... guess I
> should
> check my filesizes closely and see if there are any discrepancies.
>
> My problems were with ac94, though... what version caused the errors for
> you?
>