[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lynx
From: |
Lloyd G. Rasmussen |
Subject: |
Re: Lynx |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Dec 97 10:09:35 EST |
On Tue, 9 Dec 1997 19:17:51 -0330 (NST),
Andrew Vardy <address@hidden> wrote:
>Hi Lloyd,
>
>I have a question. What is it with having Lynx for IBM? Why was that
>created? IBM users already have a browser. Netscape. And so on. Why
>create Lynx for IBM?
>
>Isn't Lynx a rather large program? And only on Unix is it connected to
>the Internet directly. Why did anyone go through the trouble of rewriting
>Lynx for IBM? Seems a lot of work, and for no point.
>
>I mean doesn't 90% of the world use Netscape anyway?
>
>I am merely curious.
>
I hope you are asking me a serious question. I got into using Lynx,
first under Unix, because I am blind and operate my computers with the
help of screen reading programs which intercept information coming
from the keyboard and the screen and send them to a text-to-speech
synthesizer so that I can hear this information. There is at least a
two-year lag between when a new operating system or major program is
released and when someone has figured out a way to send enough of its
output to speech or to a one-line braille display so that a blind
person can use it. This time lag is shortening, but it is still
there, especially for the more graphical programs.
I now use screen reading programs in both DOS and Windows, and
frequently use both Lynx and Internet Explorer. I have also used
Netscape 2.0. If I need access to streaming audio, or want a
nice-looking printout for my sighted cowerkers, or want to get into a
site that discriminates against Lynx, I will use the Windows
browsers. But if I want information from web pages, including search
engines, Lynx is much, much more efficient. It gives the right
information at the right time. Its design has had considerable input
from blind users. For me, using the web is for finding information,
and information is a scarce commodity if you cannot read print.
The DOS port of Lynx does connect to the internet, either through a
packet driver or PPP. I find it loads pages from local files at least
ten times faster than the Windows browsers when running on a Pentium
computer with 16 megs of RAM.
We need a DOS version of Lynx because Unix shell accounts are becoming
less commonly available than PPP connections. Lynx will, if people
continue to voluntarily work on it, be of great help in the developing
nations where computer access is minimal. We don't know what its
future holds, because there is no funding to hire programmers to help
it keep up with the ever-changing web standards. But at the moment it
meets a real need for tens of thousands of real computer users.
-- Lloyd Rasmussen
Senior Staff Engineer, Engineering Section
National Library Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped
Library of Congress 202-707-0535
(work) address@hidden www.loc.gov/nls/
(home) address@hidden
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: Lynx,
Lloyd G. Rasmussen <=