[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV ac98: 1.) configure,
From: |
T.E.Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV ac98: 1.) configure, |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Dec 1997 17:04:59 -0500 (EST) |
> >Numbering probably starts at 0 for internal KEY_F(n) codes (I'll have to
> >look at
> >the terminfo description to be sure, but I've been bitten by that before).
>
> KEY_F(15) also doesn't work, but I tried KEY_REDO and that's
> DO_KEY (i.e., the VTxxx Do key works, too, now with Unix curses in the
> devel code). It looks like you need those cases only for wgetch(), not
> getch(), at least with the native solaris2 curses. Also note that you
> don't need any of that stuff for the devel code built with slang.
In ncurses, at least, it would be KEY_F(16) - I tested that.
I'm not sure about Solaris curses: I implemented the change this morning and
tested with ncurses on XFree86 xterm (which does provide an extra set of
function-keys, so I have a working F16). I just logged in to check my
test-builds on slcc, so I can check in the change.
Also am not sure about the VMS problem: the symptoms point to something
have gotten trashed that's only picked up when 'exit()' runs (e.g., a
signal handler or a file-pointer). Since I don't test on VMS, I didn't
see that - I didn't see it months ago when I did a test there.
> Fote
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey