[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.1 release
From: |
Greg Marr |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.1 release |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Sep 1998 15:25:48 -0400 |
At 12:55 PM 9/2/98 -0600, you wrote:
>In a recent note, Greg Marr said:
>> Date: Wed, 02 Sep 1998 12:07:44 -0400
>> I am a little unclear here. If lynx does not have code for handling BCC,=
>> how
>
>Perhaps it passes the header unfiltered to sendmail.
But if lynx does not have code for handling BCCs, how does the header get
there
in the first place?
>> is lynx allowing blind copy? The other question is why would you want to=
>> turn
>> off BCC for an anonymous account? What is the difference between CC and
BCC
>
>"Bcc:" is the lifeblood of SPAMmers.
More so than cc?
--
Greg Marr
address@hidden
"We thought you were dead."
"I was, but I'm better now." - Sheridan, "The Summoning"
- Re: lynx-dev 2.8.1 release, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev 2.8.1 release, Bela Lubkin, 1998/09/01
- Re: lynx-dev 2.8.1 release, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/09/01
- Re: lynx-dev 2.8.1 release, Leonid Pauzner, 1998/09/02
- Re: lynx-dev 2.8.1 release, dickey, 1998/09/02
- Re: lynx-dev 2.8.1 release, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/09/02
- Re: lynx-dev 2.8.1 release, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/09/03
- Re: lynx-dev 2.8.1 release, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/09/03