[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev when, where, why "kb/sec"?
From: |
Philip Webb |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev when, where, why "kb/sec"? |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Sep 1998 07:37:08 -0400 (EDT) |
980910 Bela Lubkin wrote:
> Philip Webb wrote:
>> it should be Kb/s for true SI style.
> "Kb" would be kilo-bits, no? "KB" for kilo-bytes?
> If they've actually "standardized" on "Kb" for Kbytes,
> that's a standard I'm going to have to consistently violate...
well, i had my tongue slightly in my cheek:
`s' is SI for `second', `K' (rather than `k') used to be `thousand',
but bits'n'bytes haven't made it into the international system yet AFAIK.
`bit' is usually written out in full, so `b' or `B' could be `byte':
capitals seem to be used when a unit is someone's name
-- eg `N' for `newton' -- , but small letters otherwise, eg `m' for `metre'.
so i'll defend `Kb/s', but won't risk dying for it ...
--
========================,,============================================
SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : address@hidden
ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies
TRANSIT `-O----------O---' University of Toronto
- Re: lynx-dev when, where, why "kb/sec"?, Bela Lubkin, 1998/09/10
- Re: lynx-dev when, where, why "kb/sec"?, Greg Barniskis, 1998/09/10
- Re: lynx-dev when, where, why "kb/sec"?, dickey, 1998/09/10
- Re: lynx-dev when, where, why "kb/sec"?, Bela Lubkin, 1998/09/10
- Re: lynx-dev when, where, why "kb/sec"?, dickey, 1998/09/10
- Re: lynx-dev when, where, why "kb/sec"?, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/09/10
- Re: lynx-dev when, where, why "kb/sec"?, Leonid Pauzner, 1998/09/11