Re: lynx-dev strange interaction with gettext/anonymous/gz

[dickey]

> Well, I haven't even looked at the dev.n code yet; but since there aren't 
> many alternatives AFAIK, and gettext seems to be the GNU way, in principle 
> I'm all for it.  I just prefer to look at other things now, and leave the 
> gettext stuff to those already more familiar with it.  As long as I don't 
> introduce or change user-visible strings, there shouldn't be a problem, 
> right? 

right.  At some point (after Thanksgiving) I'll work on moving some of the
repeated strings into LYMessages_en.h (besides the maintenance issues,
reducing the number of files with strings may make this work with Solaris'
gettext - that's one of the problems).
   
-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey