[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Lynx, relative links, and the HTTP redirections
From: |
Stephane Bortzmeyer |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Lynx, relative links, and the HTTP redirections |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Jan 1999 10:53:26 +0100 |
On Wednesday 13 January 1999, at 23 h 39, the keyboard of David Woolley
<address@hidden> wrote:
> I think you are in a rather grey area. The only way that Netscape can
> fix up the relative URL is by looking at a header which indicates the
OK, I see.
> My advice would be to use server relative, not page relative URLs.
They were generated by the WML tool, as a nice attempt to have templates which
work whatever the level of the page is. The WML approach seems to fail here.
> I think even better advice would be to steer clear of such error pages, as
> they usually omit information that is in the builtin page. Particularly
> useful, if provided, are the failed URL and the referer, as these can
> make it easy to email the response to the owner of a broken link.
Yes, but ErrorDocuments allow you to have a link to the search engine,
explanations in French and so on.