[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Re: syntax change
From: |
dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Re: syntax change |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Mar 1999 16:56:10 -0500 (EST) |
> Anyway, I agree the 123 and 123g syntax is backward.
> You would think hte meanings would be reversed.
> How about the following: treat 123 like 123g for all links
> except invisible links...
>
> > I suppose a configurable option for this is probably too much to ask for
> > though (sigh).
>
> IMO, lynx already has too many configure options, which seem to be
> added every time a small change is made.
> Does this require a config option?
configure script or options-screen? (if it's reasonably transparent
to existing usage, there's no reason for an options-screen or .lynxrc
or lynx.cfg -- that seems to be what people are discussing).
I'd use configure script mainly to be able to easily factor out bloat
or experimental code.
> --le
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
- Re: lynx-dev Re: syntax change, Laura Eaves, 1999/03/01
- Re: lynx-dev Re: syntax change,
dickey <=
- Re: lynx-dev Re: syntax change, Laura Eaves, 1999/03/01
- Re: lynx-dev Re: syntax change, Laura Eaves, 1999/03/01
- lynx-dev Re: syntax change, Kim DeVaughn, 1999/03/01
- Re: lynx-dev Re: syntax change, Philip Webb, 1999/03/02
- Re: lynx-dev syntax change - f not g, Klaus Weide, 1999/03/02
- lynx-dev Re: syntax change - f not g, Kim DeVaughn, 1999/03/02
- Re: lynx-dev syntax change - f not g, Philip Webb, 1999/03/02
- Re: lynx-dev syntax change - f not g, Klaus Weide, 1999/03/02
- Re: lynx-dev syntax change - hidden links digression, Klaus Weide, 1999/03/02
- lynx-dev NNN <something-or-nothing> (was: syntax change), Klaus Weide, 1999/03/02