[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
lynx-dev Re: NNN <something-or-nothing> (was: syntax change)
From: |
Kim DeVaughn |
Subject: |
lynx-dev Re: NNN <something-or-nothing> (was: syntax change) |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Mar 1999 02:02:04 -0800 |
On Tue, Mar 02, 1999, Klaus Weide (address@hidden) said:
|
| And make just plain 123 a configurable shortcut to one of them.
|
| 123 = 123 f - current behavior
| 123 = 123 g - what some people want
| 123 = 123 p - why not, for someone who thinks in terms of pages
| 123 = 123 X - for the new function X no-one has yet thought of
I like it. Generalizing is usually always a Good Thing ...!
/kim
- Re: lynx-dev Re: syntax change, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev Re: syntax change, Laura Eaves, 1999/03/01
- Re: lynx-dev Re: syntax change, Laura Eaves, 1999/03/01
- lynx-dev Re: syntax change, Kim DeVaughn, 1999/03/01
- Re: lynx-dev Re: syntax change, Philip Webb, 1999/03/02
- Re: lynx-dev syntax change - f not g, Klaus Weide, 1999/03/02
- lynx-dev Re: syntax change - f not g, Kim DeVaughn, 1999/03/02
- Re: lynx-dev syntax change - f not g, Philip Webb, 1999/03/02
- Re: lynx-dev syntax change - f not g, Klaus Weide, 1999/03/02
- Re: lynx-dev syntax change - hidden links digression, Klaus Weide, 1999/03/02
- lynx-dev NNN <something-or-nothing> (was: syntax change), Klaus Weide, 1999/03/02
- lynx-dev Re: NNN <something-or-nothing> (was: syntax change),
Kim DeVaughn <=
- Re: lynx-dev Re: NNN <something-or-nothing>, Philip Webb, 1999/03/02
Re: lynx-dev Re: syntax change, Henry Nelson, 1999/03/01
Re: lynx-dev Re: syntax change, dickey, 1999/03/01