[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2dev.19 patch #1 ("iso9945" problem)
From: |
dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2dev.19 patch #1 ("iso9945" problem) |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Mar 1999 22:06:38 -0500 (EST) |
> On Thu, 4 Mar 1999 address@hidden wrote:
>
> > *** orig/lynx2-8-2/README Wed Feb 17 07:29:33 1999
> > --- lynx2-8-2/README Sat Feb 20 16:24:01 1999
> > ***************
> > *** 142,148 ****
> > Any messages you wish to post should be sent to address@hidden
> > PLEASE use the lynx-dev list, NOT private email to the developers,
> > for questions or discussion about Lynx, or contributions of patches.
> > ! Patches should use the context diff format (diff -c).
>
> Is this statement out of date? It seems that more and more members of
> the list are using universal diffs rather than context diffs. Is there a
> preference one way or the other? Should we change the README file to
> allow "diff -u"?
I've read that the -u format is both more compact and easier to parse.
So I've been using it almost exclusively for some time. (I can even
read it myself ;-)
> Doug
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey