[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: why not --disable--news (was: lynx-dev --disable-gopher, why not --d
From: |
Webmaster Jim |
Subject: |
Re: why not --disable--news (was: lynx-dev --disable-gopher, why not --disable-finger)? |
Date: |
Sun, 7 Mar 1999 00:09:16 -0500 |
On Sat, Mar 06, 1999 at 11:48:26PM -0500, I wrote:
> Binary sizes:
>
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 jim wheel 1040384 Feb 26 05:44 /usr/local/bin/lynx2-8-2-dev15
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 jim wheel 929792 Mar 6 23:18 lynx
The above were built with "po" code and ncurses. Without "po", and using
native BSD curses, here's yet a smaller Lynx binary:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 jim wheel 815104 Mar 7 00:02 lynx
:-)
- lynx-dev --disable-gopher, why not --disable-finger?, John Bley, 1999/03/05
- Re: lynx-dev --disable-gopher, why not --disable-finger?, Webmaster Jim, 1999/03/06
- Re: lynx-dev --disable-gopher, why not --disable-finger?, John Bley, 1999/03/06
- why not --disable--news (was: lynx-dev --disable-gopher, why not --disable-finger)?, Webmaster Jim, 1999/03/06
- Re: why not --disable--news (was: lynx-dev --disable-gopher, why not --disable-finger)?,
Webmaster Jim <=
- lynx-dev Re: why not --disable-news, John Bley, 1999/03/07
- Re: lynx-dev why not --disable-news, Kim DeVaughn, 1999/03/07
- Re: lynx-dev why not --disable-news, John Bley, 1999/03/08
- lynx-dev Dead code removal (was: Re: why not --disable-news), Kim DeVaughn, 1999/03/08
- Re: lynx-dev Dead code removal, John Bley, 1999/03/08
- Re: lynx-dev Dead code removal, Kim DeVaughn, 1999/03/08
- Re: lynx-dev Dead code removal, Philip Webb, 1999/03/08
- Re: lynx-dev Dead code removal, Klaus Weide, 1999/03/08
- Re: lynx-dev Dead code removal, Leonid Pauzner, 1999/03/09
- Re: lynx-dev why not --disable-news, mattack, 1999/03/08