[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev style (was: local_dired cleanup)
From: |
Hiroyuki Senshu |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev style (was: local_dired cleanup) |
Date: |
Sun, 23 May 1999 16:40:32 +0900 |
Mike Castle wrote:
>
>[I've been way behind on lynx and trying to catch up; this one seemed
>recent enough to comment on.]
>
>Would an indent profile be worth including in the distribution? Not
>required use, of course. But for those of use who switch back and forth
>between various styles, might help us straighten things up before
>submissions.
It agrees to this opinion.
If the souce code style of Lynx is unified it is easy to read.
An 'indent' can use even the top such as DOS, Windows at present.
-- Hiroyuki
- lynx-dev [PATCH][pre2] local_dired cleanup, John Bley, 1999/05/12
- Re: lynx-dev [PATCH][pre2] local_dired cleanup, dickey, 1999/05/12
- lynx-dev style (was: local_dired cleanup), Mike Castle, 1999/05/23
- Re: lynx-dev style (was: local_dired cleanup),
Hiroyuki Senshu <=
- Re: lynx-dev style (was: local_dired cleanup), Lloyd G. Rasmussen, 1999/05/24
- Re: lynx-dev style (was: local_dired cleanup), Philip Webb, 1999/05/25
- Re: lynx-dev style (was: local_dired cleanup), Rick Lewis, 1999/05/25
- Re: lynx-dev style (was: local_dired cleanup), Chuck Martin, 1999/05/25
- Re: lynx-dev style (was: local_dired cleanup), Rick Lewis, 1999/05/25
- lynx-dev indentation (again: was something), Philip Webb, 1999/05/25
- Re: lynx-dev style (was: local_dired cleanup), Chuck Martin, 1999/05/25
- lynx-dev indentation (again: was something), Philip Webb, 1999/05/25
- Re: lynx-dev style (was: local_dired cleanup), Vlad Harchev, 1999/05/25