[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev problem with LYNX_TEMP_SPACE?
From: |
Henry Nelson |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev problem with LYNX_TEMP_SPACE? |
Date: |
Sat, 29 May 1999 09:45:42 +0900 (JST) |
> > > I don't mind if you completely fix this bug. Might be an area to look
> > ^don't
>
> the original sense - this is in code that's been 'fixed' since 2.8.1, and
> (like Vlad's core dump) would not be a Good Thing to introduce in a new
My key word here was "completely." As I mentioned in my corrected report,
the _when_ should temp files of _what_ kind be removed needs, IMO, some
thought and input from Lynx users. I've actually come to enjoy my fix;
it offers a freedom I've not had before (wish I'd done it earlier). But
what might even be better is for Lynx to keep track of what it has on
disk and reuse it rather than overwriting it -- which would require some
kind of configurable quota system -- so, maybe not.
__Henry
- lynx-dev problem with LYNX_TEMP_SPACE?, Henry Nelson, 1999/05/22
- lynx-dev problem with LYNX_TEMP_SPACE?, Henry Nelson, 1999/05/23
- Re: lynx-dev problem with LYNX_TEMP_SPACE?, dickey, 1999/05/27
- Re: lynx-dev problem with LYNX_TEMP_SPACE?, Henry Nelson, 1999/05/28
- Re: lynx-dev problem with LYNX_TEMP_SPACE?, Henry Nelson, 1999/05/28
- Re: lynx-dev problem with LYNX_TEMP_SPACE?, dickey, 1999/05/28
- Re: lynx-dev problem with LYNX_TEMP_SPACE?, dickey, 1999/05/28
- Re: lynx-dev problem with LYNX_TEMP_SPACE?,
Henry Nelson <=
- Re: lynx-dev problem with LYNX_TEMP_SPACE?, dickey, 1999/05/28