[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG
From: |
Klaus Weide |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG |
Date: |
Thu, 25 May 2000 15:35:07 -0500 (CDT) |
On Thu, 25 May 2000, Vlad Harchev wrote:
> On Wed, 24 May 2000, Klaus Weide wrote:
> > It's ugly, it's overhead, it's system-dependent.
>
> Of course. And in the worst case the script will be 60K big.
>
> But seems there is an even better approach - why don't do all customizations
> only once in the script like lynx-setup, that will ask user for something
> (probably) and modify lynx.cfg and user's .lynxrc (too bad we have to do it
> for each user, or provide hacks to share default .lynxrc that lynx will use
> when called). What do you think about this?
I already pointed Atsuhito Kohda to
<http://surfchem0.riken.go.jp/~kubota/linuxwork/language-env.html>
<http://packages.debian.org/language-env>
(or he already knew about it). Have a look at it.
I think he should add ad module for lynx to it.
But that's very Debian-specific. And there are probably good reasons
why that machanism hasn't widely caught on (even within Debian, it seems).
It only supports 4 or so languages. It does too many things, and
different ones for each of them.
Klaus
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG, pAb-032871, 2000/05/24
- lynx-dev Is Lynx still practical? (was Re: lynx should respect LANG), Michael Warner, 2000/05/26
- Re: lynx-dev Is Lynx still practical?, Donald Rober, 2000/05/26
- Re: lynx-dev Is Lynx still practical?, David Woolley, 2000/05/27
- Re: lynx-dev Is Lynx still practical?, Duncan Simpson, 2000/05/27
- Re: lynx-dev Is Lynx still practical?, Thomas Dickey, 2000/05/27