Re: lynx-dev Re: [PATCH 2.8.4dev.20] Hot place for URL goto

[Vlad Harchev]

On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Henry Nelson wrote:

> > P.S.  I see no reason for existence of a dumbed-down style-less lynx.
> 
> I see no reason for the existence of a smarted-up styled lynx.  Why?
> Because the so-called "lss" is a misnomer and doesn't even come close to
> support for CSS.  It just means more configuration for a modicum of

 Lss is not meant to be a mean for supporting css (provided by site author). 
 It's just a mean to arbitrary and precisely color various html tags
(independantly of the URL the html came from). 

> fanciness, which I don't need or want.  As it is, the Lynx community cannot
> even come to a consensus on what the default seven colors ought to be.
> I shudder at the thought of what lss.cfg would throw at me.  Weeks of lost
> time trying to get the screen back to "normal."

 I think that time will worth it - pretty screen is something useful.

 Best regards,
  -Vlad


; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden