[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev latest status on java script support?
From: |
David Woolley |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev latest status on java script support? |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Mar 2002 07:31:01 +0000 (GMT) |
> As for complaining, forget it. The folks out there are
> happily cranking their Microsoft systems and saying that they
> read somewhere that JAWS which runs only on Windows and costs up
> to $1500 solves all the worlds problems so just give up and start
> shoveling money. The game is over.
This is the standard position that marketing people will take; if
there is some technology that allows the blind to access their site,
they will consider they have met any legal obligations for
accessibility. This will be a moving target, especially as JAWS uses
IE for its scripting support.
> What I actually think is that limited javascript support
Limited support might cope with Domino, as their way of doing onclicks
with links to the non-existent null fragment (href="#") may not change
enough to make it difficult to extract the real link. However anything
short of a full IE like object model (full frames support, etc.) is likely
to break for the "creative" designers. That's a complete re-write, not
limited support.
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- Re: lynx-dev latest status on java script support?, (continued)
Re: lynx-dev latest status on java script support?, Martin McCormick, 2002/03/12
- Re: lynx-dev latest status on java script support?,
David Woolley <=
Re: lynx-dev latest status on java script support?, Henry Nelson, 2002/03/12
Re: lynx-dev latest status on java script support?, Martin McCormick, 2002/03/13
Re: lynx-dev latest status on java script support?, Philip Webb, 2002/03/13
Re: lynx-dev latest status on java script support?, Henry Nelson, 2002/03/13
Re: lynx-dev latest status on java script support?, Lloyd Rasmussen, 2002/03/13