Re: lynx-dev archive problem

[purslow]

040220 Doug Kaufman wrote:
> It was thought best to leave the spam, rather than break the links.

(breathes in deeply) that was not v sensible:
no-one in their right mind is going to go back to an archive full of spam,
esp when there are  >= 3  alternatives easily available (see FM's list).

if that is the best Flora & its advisors can come up w ,
the best course is simply to close the whole operation down.

-- 
========================,,============================================
SUPPORT     ___________//___,  Philip Webb : address@hidden
ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|  Centre for Urban & Community Studies
TRANSIT    `-O----------O---'  University of Toronto

; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden