m17n-list
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Problem in hi-itrans or not?


From: Mike FABIAN
Subject: Problem in hi-itrans or not?
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 16:53:05 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)

Somebody reported an issue against ibus-m17n while trying to use hi-itrans:

https://github.com/ibus/ibus-m17n/issues/85

What he observes has nothing to do with ibus-m17n though, it is the
normal behaviour of hi-itrans. He writes:

> According to the ITRANS unicode table
> (https://www.aczoom.com/itrans/online/itrans6/itrans-tables-unicode.pdf)
> and documentation (https://www.aczoom.com/itrans/html/dvnc/node3.html),
> the key combination .c is supposed to modify the character preceding it
> it (e.g. ka.c -> कॅ , aa.c -> ऑ ), however when I try this, I get कऍ and
> आऍ respectively. Inputting .c thus returns ऍ , rather than modifying the
> previous character.
> 
> To Reproduce
> Steps to reproduce the behavior:
> 
>     Click on ibus tray icon.
>     Click on 'Hindi - hi-itrans (m17n)'.
>     Type 'aa.c' on US-style keyboard.
>     See it return 'आऍ'.
> 
> Expected behavior
> I expected input 'aa.c' to return 'ऑ'.

With hi-itrans (and also with mr-itrans and mr-gamabhana) one can do this:

To get कॅ you can type k.c instead of ka.c.
To get ऑ you can type o.c instead of aa.c.

But the link he gave
(https://www.aczoom.com/itrans/online/itrans6/itrans-tables-unicode.pdf)
mentions "ka.c कॅ".

So I wonder whether there is a problem in hi-itrans or not. Is the table
at the link
https://www.aczoom.com/itrans/online/itrans6/itrans-tables-unicode.pdf
relevant? Is it up-to-date?

Or maybe hi-itrans is fine as it is now ...


-- 
Mike FABIAN <mfabian@redhat.com>
睡眠不足はいい仕事の敵だ。




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]