Re: license question

[Gary V. Vaughan]

Hi Eric,

Sorry for the late reply.

On Jul 25, 2007, at 12:04 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> While cleaning up the GPLv3 update, I noticed that CVS Head  
> currently has
> m4/COPYING.LIB with LGPL 2.1, inserted in 2000 by Gary.  But  
> nothing in
> CVS mentions being licensed under LGPL.  Now that LGPLv3 is available,
> there's even less reason to refer to LGPL 2.1 in CVS.  I'm thinking  
> the
> best thing to do is just remove COPYING.LIB, but I wanted to make sure
> before doing it.

IIRC (and memory does get a little hazy after 7 years!), I was  
thinking of
shipping libm4 under LGPL at the time.  I'm not especially attached  
to that
idea though, so feel free to remove if you'd like.

Cheers,
        Gary
--
  ())_.              Email me: address@hidden
  ( '/           Read my blog: http://blog.azazil.net
  / )=         ...and my book: http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
`(_~)_      Join my AGLOCO Network: http://www.agloco.com/r/BBBS7912

PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part