maposmatic-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Maposmatic-dev] [PATCH maposmatic] Improve the file cleanup mechani


From: Maxime Petazzoni
Subject: Re: [Maposmatic-dev] [PATCH maposmatic] Improve the file cleanup mechanism
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:36:52 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

Hi,

* David MENTRE <address@hidden> [2010-01-13 16:24:49]:

> 2010/1/13 Maxime Petazzoni <address@hidden>:
> >     def is_done(self):
> > -        return self.status == 2
> > +        return self.status >= 2
> 
> You are changing the semantics of is_done (which was previously "done
> with files"). Anyway, even if you decide to change the semantics of
> is_done, I would rather write:
>   self.status == 2 || self.status == 3
> In the sake of prevention against further changes.

I don't think I'm really changing the semantics of is_done. The job is
still done when status == 3. I agree that self.status == 2 ||
self.status == 3 might be better, but it doesn't make a big difference
right now and we can fix it later when adding other statuses.

I'll submit a patch later with that specific change.

> >     def is_done_ok(self):
> >         return self.is_done() and self.resultmsg == "ok"
> 
> In that case, we could have a job is_done==True, resultmsg=="ok" but
> no file (if status == 3).

Yes, as I said I'm not changing the semantics of is_done. If status ==
3, the job is still done, and is_done_ok can still be a successfully
completed job, but its files were removed later.

- Maxime

-- 
Maxime Petazzoni <http://www.bulix.org>
 ``One by one, the penguins took away my sanity.''
Linux kernel and software developer at MontaVista Software

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]