[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Userops] How Sandstorm enables userops (rather than "dev"eleoper op
From: |
Christopher Allan Webber |
Subject: |
Re: [Userops] How Sandstorm enables userops (rather than "dev"eleoper ops) (part 1) |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Apr 2015 14:42:48 -0500 |
Asheesh Laroia writes:
> Sandstorm's goal is to make things easy and also make it safe. The last
> thing I want is to enable people to mass-install web apps with poor
> security so we "help people self-host" but that actually causes massive
> data breaches among the people I'm trying to help. In that sense, I was
> impressed by Chris Webber's "user ops" terminology.
Just as a brief comment: paying attention to capability security is
great, but probably the most promising metric for *me* that Sandstorm
may succeed is that they hired Asheesh Laroia. ;)
You already know the list of challenging issues I think Sandstorm has to
overcome (especially in backporting a capability model system on top of
a very not-that environment), but I am sincerely hoping Sandstorm
figures that stuff out! And I'm glad you're hanging out on the userops
list.
- Chris