Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] signalling asynchronous, non-error conditions from microcode

[Chris Hanson]

On 12/24/05, Taylor Campbell <address@hidden> wrote:

> Neither of these seems appropriate, but I can't find any other way to
> send any sort of asynchronous signal to Scheme that Edwin could pick
> up with a condition handler or somesuch.  Is there a better way to do
> this, or would one of these solutions suffice?

Allocate a new interrupt (not a keyboard interrupt).  I suggest
INT_Global_3, which appears to be unused.  Then hook an appropriate
handler to it on the runtime side.