[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] r6rs

From: Chris Hanson
Subject: Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] r6rs
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:52:32 -0800

On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Andrew McAuliffe <address@hidden> wrote:

> I was wondering about the rational for that, so I searched all the mailing
> lists for an announcement explaining why r6rs was not going to be
> implemented, or a discussion about whether it should be implemented or not,
> but I found no posts that seemed to address that.

Read the comments I submitted with my "no" vote on the site.
For that matter, read _all_ the comments to get an interesting
picture.  One thing you'll notice is that a large number of very
experienced Schemers voted against ratification, and wrote eloquent

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]