Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] r6rs

[Chris Hanson]

On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Andrew McAuliffe <address@hidden> wrote:

> I was wondering about the rational for that, so I searched all the mailing
> lists for an announcement explaining why r6rs was not going to be
> implemented, or a discussion about whether it should be implemented or not,
> but I found no posts that seemed to address that.

Read the comments I submitted with my "no" vote on the r6rs.org site.
For that matter, read _all_ the comments to get an interesting
picture.  One thing you'll notice is that a large number of very
experienced Schemers voted against ratification, and wrote eloquent
explanations.